Unilateral and bilateral sacropelvic fixation result in similar construct biomechanics.
نویسندگان
چکیده
STUDY DESIGN In vitro biomechanical investigation of lumbosacropelvic spinal instrumentation. OBJECTIVE Determine whether unilateral iliac fixation, with or without an L6 to S1 interbody graft, provides equivalent biomechanical stability compared with bilateral iliac fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Recent clinical evidence has shown improved clinical outcomes of unilateral iliac fixation compared with bilateral instrumentation that contradicts biomechanical data supporting bilateral instrumentation, although no specific investigation has compared unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation. METHODS Sixteen porcine spines were instrumented with bilateral segmental pedicle screws from L1 to S1 and 5.5-mm titanium rods. Spines were randomized to either have an intact L6 to S1 disc space (n = 8/group) or a full discectomy and intervertebral cage at L6 to S1 (n = 8/group). Four reflective noncolinear markers were attached to both L6 and S1. Spines were tested with bilateral ilium, unilateral ilium, and sacrum-only fixation in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion between +/-7.0 Nm. L6 to S1 range of motion (degrees) and mechanical stiffness (Nmm/degrees) were compared between groups with a 2-way analysis of variance (P < 0.05). RESULTS No significant differences were found in construct stiffness or L6 to S1 motion between unilateral or bilateral fixation for any test direction and both demonstrated significantly less L6 to S1 motion compared with sacrum-only fixation for all tests (all P values <0.005). Bilateral fixation was significantly stiffer than sacrum-only fixation in flexion and extension (P < 0.0001). The interbody cage significantly decreased construct stiffness in extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion (P < 0.002), and significantly increased L6 to S1 motion in torsion compared with an intact disc (P < 0.03). CONCLUSION There were no biomechanical differences between bilateral and unilateral iliac screw fixation. Intervertebral cage with full discectomy was significantly less stiff than intact. This study provides biomechanical data to correlate with improved clinical outcomes using unilateral iliac screw fixation, and evidence contraindicating full discectomy with intervertebral cage placement.
منابع مشابه
Biomechanical Evaluation of Unilateral Versus Bilateral C1 Lateral Mass-C2 Intralaminar Fixation
STUDY DESIGN Biomechanical, cadaveric study. OBJECTIVES To compare the relative stiffness of unilateral C1 lateral mass-C2 intralaminar fixation to intact specimens and bilateral C1 lateral mass-C2 intralaminar constructs. METHODS The biomechanical integrity of a unilateral C1 lateral mass-C2 intralaminar screw construct was compared to intact specimens and bilateral C1 lateral mass-C2 intr...
متن کاملSurgical resection and reconstruction after resection of tumors involving the sacropelvic region.
OBJECTIVES Surgical management of tumors in the sacropelvic region is a challenging field of spine surgery because of the region's complex local anatomy and biomechanics. Recent developments in anesthesia and intensive care have allowed us to perform extended surgeries focused on the en bloc resection of sacropelvic tumors. Various techniques for the resection and for the reconstruction were pu...
متن کاملFinite Element Analysis of a New Pedicle Screw-Plate System for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
PURPOSE Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) is increasingly popular for the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar disc diseases. The constructs intended for segmental stability are varied in MI-TLIF. We adopted finite element (FE) analysis to compare the stability after different construct fixations using interbody cage with posterior pedicle screw-rod or ped...
متن کاملBiomechanics of Lateral Interbody Spacers: Going Wider for Going Stiffer
This study investigates the biomechanical stability of a large interbody spacer inserted by a lateral approach and compares the biomechanical differences with the more conventional transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF), with and without supplemental pedicle screw (PS) fixation. Twenty-four L2-L3 functional spinal units (FSUs) were tested with three interbody cage options: (i) 18 mm XLIF cage, ...
متن کاملEvaluation of unilateral cage-instrumented fixation for lumbar spine
BACKGROUND To investigate how unilateral cage-instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) affects the three-dimensional flexibility in degenerative disc disease by comparing the biomechanical characteristics of unilateral and bilateral cage-instrumented PLIF. METHODS Twelve motion segments in sheep lumbar spine specimens were tested for flexion, extension, axial rotation, and latera...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Spine
دوره 33 20 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008